My Thoughts
The Mid-Level Training Trap: Why Your Best People Are Leaving and You Don't Even Know It
Related Articles:
Mid-level employees are the backbone of Australian business, yet 67% of organisations treat them like they're invisible.
I've been watching this unfold for seventeen years across Brisbane, Melbourne, and Perth offices, and it's getting worse. Last month alone, I had three different CEOs ring me asking why their "rising stars" were jumping ship to competitors. The answer? They'd forgotten these people existed.
Here's what drives me mental about mid-level training in this country. Everyone talks about graduate programs and executive development. Millions spent on leadership retreats for the C-suite. More millions on onboarding fresh-faced university kids. But Sarah from accounts receivable who's been crushing her targets for four years? She gets a half-day workshop on "time management" if she's lucky.
It's bloody shortsighted.
The Forgotten Middle Child Syndrome
Mid-level staff are like middle children in a dysfunctional family. They're not cute and new like the graduates. They're not powerful like the executives. They just... exist. Doing the heavy lifting. Making everything actually work.
I was consulting with a mining company in Western Australia last year - can't name them, but they're one of the big players - and their operations manager told me something that stuck. "We spend $180,000 per graduate on their two-year program. Our team leaders who actually run the sites? They get a $400 safety refresher once a year."
When I dug deeper, turns out their site supervisors had been asking for project management training for three years. Three years! Meanwhile, they'd hired four external consultants at $2,000 per day to manage projects these same supervisors could've handled with proper training.
The maths doesn't add up. But more importantly, the respect doesn't add up either.
What Mid-Level Training Actually Looks Like When Done Right
Real mid-level development isn't about teaching people to make better PowerPoints. It's about bridging the gap between doing and leading. It's messy, it's practical, and it shouldn't happen in a conference room with motivational posters.
I'm talking about handling office politics training that actually prepares people for the reality of interdepartmental warfare. Not the sanitised version where everyone learns to "disagree respectfully." The real version where Jenny from marketing actively sabotages your project because she thinks your team gets too much attention.
Technical skills matter too, obviously. But here's where most trainers get it wrong - they focus on the latest software or methodology without teaching people how to influence outcomes when they don't have formal authority. That's the sweet spot where mid-level people live. Too senior to just follow orders, too junior to give them.
The Melbourne Incident That Changed My Mind
About five years ago, I was running a workshop for a logistics company in Melbourne. Standard stuff - communication skills, delegation basics. Tick-the-box training, really. Then this bloke named Dave, a warehouse supervisor, pulled me aside during the break.
"Mate," he said, "this is all fine, but when my team lead calls in sick and I've got forty casual workers who don't speak English as their first language, plus a client breathing down my neck because their delivery is late, plus head office wanting three different reports by 5pm... how exactly do I 'actively listen' my way out of that?"
He was right. I was teaching theory when what he needed was tactical expertise.
That conversation made me completely rethink how managing difficult conversations should be taught. Not through role-playing scenarios about performance reviews, but through real-time problem-solving where people learn to think on their feet.
Why Australian Businesses Keep Getting This Wrong
We're stuck in this American-imported model where development is either "leadership" or "skills training." Nothing in between. But mid-level roles require something different - what I call "influencing sideways." You need to get things done through people who don't report to you, often across departments, sometimes across sites.
The other problem? We measure training by attendance, not outcomes. I've seen companies proudly report that 94% of mid-level staff completed their mandatory training modules. Meanwhile, their employee engagement scores are tanking and their best people are updating their LinkedIn profiles.
The Real Cost of Ignoring Your Middle
Here's a statistic that should terrify every business owner: replacing a mid-level employee costs approximately 1.5 times their annual salary. For someone earning $75,000, that's over $110,000 in recruitment, onboarding, and lost productivity.
But the hidden cost is worse. Mid-level people are your institutional knowledge. They know which clients are actually profitable. They understand why certain processes exist. They can predict which projects will fail before they even start.
When they leave, they take all of that with them.
I've watched entire departments implode because the "right-hand person" decided they'd had enough of being overlooked. Companies spend years rebuilding capabilities that could've been retained with a $5,000 training investment.
What Actually Works (And What Doesn't)
Generic leadership programs? Waste of time for mid-level staff. They need specific skills for specific situations.
Online modules? Only effective if combined with real-world application and peer support.
Managing difficult conversations training? Absolutely essential, but it needs to be scenario-based, not theory-based.
The best mid-level training I've seen includes:
Project management fundamentals (not certification - practical application). Influence without authority techniques. Cross-functional collaboration strategies. Basic financial literacy for non-finance roles. Change management for when they're implementing, not designing, the change.
But here's the crucial part - it needs to be delivered in their context. A retail supervisor needs different skills than a manufacturing team leader, even though they're both "mid-level."
The Brisbane Banking Example
One of my favourite success stories involved a regional bank in Brisbane. They were losing customer relationship managers faster than they could replace them. Exit interviews kept mentioning "lack of development opportunities."
Instead of throwing money at generic leadership courses, we designed something specific. We called it "Customer Advocacy Training" - teaching relationship managers how to navigate internal systems to actually solve customer problems, rather than just apologising for them.
The program included mock scenarios where they had to negotiate with different departments to resolve complex customer issues. Real situations. Real constraints. Real outcomes.
Six months later, their retention improved by 40%. Customer satisfaction scores went up. And several of those relationship managers got promoted to senior roles because they'd developed genuine leadership capabilities, not just theoretical knowledge.
Making It Happen in Your Organisation
Start by asking your mid-level people what they actually need. Not what you think they need. What they're struggling with day-to-day.
Map out the real decision-making processes in your organisation. Where do mid-level people get stuck? What approvals do they need? Who do they have to influence to get things done?
Then design training around those realities.
And for the love of all that's holy, stop calling it "leadership development." They're not ready for leadership yet. They need "advancement preparation" or "influence building" or just "practical skills for getting stuff done."
The Bottom Line
Mid-level training isn't about preparing people for promotion (though it might lead to that). It's about maximising the value of the talent you already have. It's about showing your backbone employees that you see them, value them, and want to invest in their success.
The companies that figure this out first will have a massive advantage. While their competitors are losing institutional knowledge and struggling with engagement, they'll have a motivated, capable middle layer driving results.
Your mid-level people aren't waiting around to be developed. They're making decisions about their future right now. The question is whether you'll be part of that future or just another company they used to work for.
Start investing in them properly, or start budgeting for their replacements.
Our Favourite Blogs: